BaseX-Talk November 2020

basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de

23 participants
25 discussions

recursively used variables
by Rob Stapper 12 Aug '24

12 Aug '24

Hi, The code[1] below and send as attachment generates a error message: “Static variable depends on itself: $Q{http://www.w3.org/2005/xquery-local-functions}test”. I use these variables to refer to my private functions in my modules so I can easyly refer to them in a inheritance situation. It’s not a big problem for me but I was wondering if the error-triggering is justified or that it should work. [1]=========================================== declare variable $local:test := local:test#1 ; … [View More]

4 7

Autocomplete with RESTXQ
by Imsieke, Gerrit, le-tex 21 Jul '21

21 Jul '21

Hi List, Can anyone recommend a lightweight vanilla Javascript autocomplete library that can easily be used together with BaseX RESTXQ? Maybe even a readily cloneable/modifiable example? I don’t have a preference for a server response format. The RESTXQ service may be configured to return XML, JSON, or HTML No CORS restrictions need to be considered, the query host is the same that delivers the HTML pages. Gerrit

4 7

Package for system integration
by karlo＠fastmail.com 20 Jun '21

20 Jun '21

I have packaged basex in a way that I believe will be easier for integration with package managers. https://klarinet.kos.ovh/fossil/basex-root-install/uv/basex-9.4.3.tar.gz >From the root of that archive, you can build and install like this. make make install # as root The above will install to the prefix /usr/local. You can set a different prefix. Here is an example. make clean make PREFIX=/usr make PREFIX=/usr install # as root A secondary benefit of this package is the … [View More]

3 6

BaseX 9.4.2: Tweaks & Fixes
by Christian Grün 02 Apr '21

02 Apr '21

Dear all, We have released another 9.4 late-summer maintenance release with new performance tweaks and minor bug fixes: http://basex.org In addition, we have started a new Wiki article on XQuery optimizations, which we plan to extend step by step: https://docs.basex.org/wiki/XQuery_Optimizations We are looking forward to your feedback; have fun, Your BaseX Team

2 7

Options for ft:search
by Sebastian Zimmer 15 Mar '21

15 Mar '21

Hi, I'd like to request a feature concerning the ft:search method: An `lserror` option that works exactly like the global option `LSERROR`. It would be nice if we could set the maximum Levenshtein distance specifically for each fuzzy search without having to adjust the global option. Another question on ft:search: Is there a reason why it doesn't have a `case` option just like ft:contains has one? Best regards, Sebastian

2 3

Copying databases between servers: pth.basex?
by James Ball 12 Dec '20

12 Dec '20

Hello, I’ve been debugging a strange issue on a system and I can’t quite understand what’s causing it. I create some databases on my local laptop (macOS). They provide master data for a larger system so I then copy them to a cloud server (Linode/Amazon). I recently switched updated some queries to use db:open with a path restriction to make them run faster. Everything worked on the laptop but nothing was returned on the server for the same paths. If I optimise(all) the database on the … [View More]

2 3

Performance: first and second xQuery execution / local PC and server
by BIRKNER Michael 30 Nov '20

30 Nov '20

Hello BaseX-Community, I have a question concerning performance ... once again ... sorry ;-) First thing I noticed is that when I run a query that involves quite a lot of data (more information below), the first execution of the query takes much more time as the second execution. In my example, the first execution on a certain machine (more information below) took 4,61 hours, the second execution of the very same query took 23,8 minutes. I suppose that there is some caching mechanism in place?… [View More] Is that true? Second thing is that the same xQuery mentioned above has an extremly different performance on two different machines. I am testing the xQuery on my local PC where it runs quite fast (4,7 minutes on first execution; 4,5 minutes on second execution). On a (virtual) server (where the xQuery should run in the end) it takes much longer (as mentioned above: 4,61 hours on first execution; 23,8 minutes on second execution). Here are some more details: Local PC (fast execution): - OS: Ubuntu Desktop 18.04.5 LTS - RAM: 16GB LPDDR3, 2133 MT/s - Processor: Intel Core i7-8565U 1.80GHz, 8 CPUs - Java version: OpenJDK 11.0.9.1 - BaseX version: 9.4.4 (from the zip archive), using the command line client with Xmx6g Virtual Server, VMware (slow execution): - OS: Ubuntu Server 20.04.1 LTS - RAM: 16GB (no other details available) - Processor: Intel Xeon Gold 6126 2.60GHz, 4 CPUs - Java version: OpenJDK 11.0.9.1 - BaseX version: 9.4.4 (from the zip archive), using the command line client with Xmx6g The data for testing and the xQuery that is executed are exactly the same, also the BaseX version (9.4.4) and the assigned memory (6 GB). The data that I use are freely available library data. They can be downloaded here if that is for interest: 1. https://data.dnb.de/GND/authorities-geografikum_dnbmarc_20201013.mrc.xml.gz 2. https://data.dnb.de/GND/authorities-koerperschaft_dnbmarc_20201013.mrc.xml.… 3. https://data.dnb.de/GND/authorities-kongress_dnbmarc_20201013.mrc.xml.gz 4. https://data.dnb.de/GND/authorities-person_dnbmarc_20201013.mrc.xml.gz 5. https://data.dnb.de/GND/authorities-sachbegriff_dnbmarc_20201013.mrc.xml.gz 6. https://data.dnb.de/GND/authorities-werk_dnbmarc_20201013.mrc.xml.gz So I have 6 data sets from the downloaded data. For each of these data sets I create a separate BaseX database (with options INTPARSE=true and STRIPNS=true ... other options are not touched, so that they have their default values). The databases are named "geografikum", "koerperschaft", "kongress", "person", "sachbegriff" and "werk". I have to mention that the data set "person" is quite big (~20 GB). The others are between 1 GB and 6 GB in size. The databases are not altered before the execution, so all indexes (ATTRINDEX, TEXTINDEX) should be up to date. The xQuery (see below) that I execute does this: 1. Get ID numbers from two other databases ("db1" and "db2" in the xQuery below). I get 144560 ID numbers in total. 2. Iterate over the 6 databases created from the data sets mentioned above and get all records that have one of the 144560 ID numbers that were retrieved before. 3. Count the retreived records from the 6 databases. The result is 134388 records. As mentioned: The execution (especially the first run) on the virtual server is very slow compared to the execution on the local PC. The final goal is not to count the retrieved records, but to create a new database from them. I just encountered the performance issues when I did some testing with "count()". But creating the new database has the same performance issues. So now I basically have 3 questions: 1. Why is the first execution of the xQuery so slow and the second one faster, especially on the server? 2. Why is the execution on the server much slower than on the local PC? 3. I there any way to speed that up? Would it e. g. make sense to split up the very big dataset "person" into multiple databases? Could that big dataset be the bottleneck? Finally, here is the xQuery that is executed: (: Get IDs from 2 other databases :) let $otherDBs := ('db1', 'db2') let $idsInOtherDBs := (# db:enforceindex #) { for $otherDB in $otherDBs return distinct-values(db:open($otherDB)/collection/record /datafield[@tag=('689', '100', '110', '111', '700', '710', '711')] /subfield[@code='0']) } (: Get records from 6 datasets by ID from other databases :) let $searchDBs := ('geografikum', 'koerperschaft', 'kongress', 'person', 'sachbegriff', 'werk') let $result := (# db:enforceindex #) { for $searchDB in $searchDBs return (db:text($searchDB, $idsInOtherDBs) /parent::element(subfield))[(@attribute(code)='a')] /parent::element(datafield)[(@attribute(tag)='035')] /parent::element(record) union (db:text($searchDB, $idsInOtherDBs) /parent::element(controlfield))[(@attribute(tag)='001')] /parent::element(record) } (: Count the records :) return count($result) As always: Thank you very much for any suggestions! Michael [View Less]

2 2

Future of the BaseX crypto library
by Joe Wicentowski 28 Nov '20

28 Nov '20

Dear fellow BaseX users, For anyone interested in the future of the EXPath Crypto spec and lib, I posted an important update to the EXPath community group with questions for users of the spec and implementations thereof. Please feel free to chime in: https://github.com/expath/expath-cg/issues/132. Thanks very much to Christian, who already has. I'd welcome any other users of the crypto library to register their ideas. Thank you, Joe

1 0

Re: [basex-talk] Re: Sequence comparison
by Martin Honnen 27 Nov '20

27 Nov '20

4 3

Sequence comparison
by Giuseppe G. A. Celano 26 Nov '20

26 Nov '20

Hi, I have to compare two sequences and find common items, irrespective of their positions: for $a in (1,2,3,5,3) for $u in (1,3,2,3) where $a = $u group by $o := $a return <c>{$a}</c> This returns <c>1</c> <c>2</c> <c>3 3 3 3</c> I would like 3 to be repeated only twice (i.e., each item in the first sequence should pair only with one in the second sentence): is there an XQuery "trick" for that in the FLOWR expression?

3 4

2025

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

BaseX-Talk November 2020