Hi Christian,

Thnx.  You made me a bit worrying there.

Just a thought: shouldn’t util:if not just be part of the regular BaseX syntax? Together with fn:for-each, the fn:fold functions and hof:fold-left1, they represent the group of procesflow-controll-functions.

Best,

Rob

Sent from Mail for Windows

Send BaseX-Talk mailing list submissions to

                basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit

                https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk

or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to

                basex-talk-request@mailman.uni-konstanz.de

You can reach the person managing the list at

                basex-talk-owner@mailman.uni-konstanz.de

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific

than "Re: Contents of BaseX-Talk digest..."

Today's Topics:

   1. Re: BaseX 10.7 and util:if (Christian Gr?n)

   2. Debugging XML catalog with BaseX 10.7 (Andy Bunce)

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1

Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 15:30:47 +0100

From: Christian Gr?n <christian.gruen@gmail.com>

To: Andy Bunce <bunce.andy@gmail.com>

Cc: BaseX <basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de>

Subject: Re: [basex-talk] BaseX 10.7 and util:if

Message-ID:

                <CAP94bnN+BFAv6cRqvRwiDMLSw6hqN7pU12PcgUeN54XF-BwoAw@mail.gmail.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi Andy, hi Rob,

util:if is back again.

Just give me a note if there are other functions in the Utility Module (or

in the HOF Module) that you rely on.

Best,

Christian

On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 1:15?PM Andy Bunce <bunce.andy@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,

> The documentation for the utility module [1] says certain functions will

> be removed in version 11 because they will be in XPath 4.0.

> However, util:if has been removed from the documentation and I think there

> is no equivalent function in this case.

> util:if is an alternative  syntax for the BaseX Ternary operator  [2].

> 

> ( I have used it because it was easier than trying to get my XQuery parser

> EBNF to accept  $ok ?? 1 !! 0 etc)

> 

> Is util:if to be removed?

> 

> /Andy

> [1] https://docs.basex.org/wiki/Utility_Module#util:if

> [2] https://docs.basex.org/wiki/XQuery_Extensions#Ternary_If

> 

-------------- next part --------------

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

URL: <http://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/pipermail/basex-talk/attachments/20231123/57f57d28/attachment-0001.htm>

------------------------------

Message: 2

Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2023 16:20:15 +0000

From: Andy Bunce <bunce.andy@gmail.com>

To: BaseX <basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de>

Subject: [basex-talk] Debugging XML catalog with BaseX 10.7

Message-ID:

                <CAPH12r19Jg=avu_he6ZKProwM4GuG5CUTgmfoZEtsFXk7yk5nw@mail.gmail.com>

Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"

Hi,

I am following the guide at [1] with the aim of loading some XML with a

variety of DTD doctypes.

I have a catalog.xml set (which works in another app) and in lib/custom I

have

   - saxon-he-10.9.jar

   - xmlresolver-5.2.2-data.jar

   - xmlresolver-5.2.2.jar

   - xmlresolver.properties

It is not working as I hoped. Is there a way to get debug info from

xmlresolver to a file without going to the Java level?

The guide says "You must configure your environment with an appropriate

logging backend." [2]

I guess this is about SLF4J <http://www.slf4j.org/> but I have no

experience here.

/Andy

[1] https://docs.basex.org/wiki/Catalog_Resolver

[2] https://xmlresolver.org/ch06#xml.catalog.defaultLoggerLogLevel

-------------- next part --------------

An HTML attachment was scrubbed...

URL: <http://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/pipermail/basex-talk/attachments/20231123/5bcb5957/attachment-0001.htm>

End of BaseX-Talk Digest, Vol 167, Issue 9

******************************************