2010/8/20 Leonard Wörteler <span dir="ltr">&lt;<a href="mailto:leonard.woerteler@uni-konstanz.de">leonard.woerteler@uni-konstanz.de</a>&gt;</span><br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
</div>the XQJ binding traverses the DOM tree by itsself (which will be changed<br>
in the near future because of the ecxcessive complexity related to<br>
finding and declaring implicitly declared namespaces...). I&#39;m currently<br>
working on a more stable approach. I therefor wouldn&#39;t recommend taking<br>
the old code as reference.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Yes - aside from the <a href="http://top.cs.vt.edu/~gback/bx/b622/TestNS.java">bug I recently alerted you</a> to I believe there are more bugs in the current code (I&#39;ve seen xmlns=&quot;&quot; being added by BaseX in some interior nodes.) </div>
<div> </div><div> - Godmar</div><div><br></div></div>