Hi Martin,

I found even more weird situation
parse-json('{"1:aa": 1, "2:bb": 2}')

returns
{"2:bb":2.0e0,"1:aa":1.0e0}

Seems like order is inversed
But,
parse-json('{"aa": 1, "b": 2, "ab": 3}')

returns
{"aa":1.0e0,"ab":3.0e0,"b":2.0e0}

and, finally
parse-json('{"aa": 1, "b": 2, "ab": 3, "1:aa": 1, "2:bb": 2}')

returns
{"aa":1.0e0,"ab":3.0e0,"b":2.0e0,"2:bb":2.0e0,"1:aa":1.0e0}

🤯

It seems like a bug to me ;)

As I said, in XPath 3.1 and XQuery 3.1 maps are unordered collections, you might get any order when parsing a particular JSON into an XDM 3.1 map.

If it is any help, in the BaseX fiddle you probably get/see the order preservation you want/expect.

If we are talking about the JSON standard, not xQuery, devs will expect the function which behaves in the same way as it does in many other languages.

Well, I have been around long enough to remember JavaScript/ECMAScript objects as unordered so some features change in the course of time, I also think, Python, for instance only recently switched to some order preservation in its dictionary type.

I don't know what to suggest for the current BaseX release, unfortunately http://www.woerteler.de/xquery/modules/ordered-map.html is not accessible.