---------- Weitergeleitete Nachricht ----------
Von: "Eliot Kimber" <ekimber@contrext.com>
Datum: 27.01.2016 6:25 nachm.
Betreff: Re: [basex-talk] Status of BaseX Docker Container?
An: "Christian Grün" <christian.gruen@gmail.com>
Cc:

> I have successfully created a new image based on the base image that
> provides my custom DFST Link Manager web app. Just a matter of copying the
> files into the BaseX directory structure (in my case, fetched from github).
>
> Because I'm doing DITA processing I have to enable DTD entity reference
> resolution. I'm doing that by using the entity resolution catalog provided
> by the DITA Open Toolkit. In this container context I am setting up a
> separate DITA OT container (rather than bundling the OT into the BaseX
> container, which would be easier but would make system configuration and
> maintenance harder). So I need to work out how to expose file systems from
> containers so they can share volumes. I know this is possible just haven't
> done it yet.
>
> Cheers,
>
> E.
> ----
> Eliot Kimber, Owner
> Contrext, LLC
> http://contrext.com
>
>
>
>
> On 1/27/16, 4:06 AM, "Christian Grün" <christian.gruen@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >…thanks for the hints on the Windows solution! I’ll try it in a while.
> >
> >
> >On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:13 PM, Eliot Kimber <ekimber@contrext.com>
> >wrote:
> >> Forgot to add the Windows part:
> >>
> >> Under windows have to explicitly publish the ports when running the
> >> container:
> >>
> >> docker run --name=basex -p 8984:8984 -p 1984:1984 dfst/basex
> >>
> >> then you can use the IP address of the docker-engine VM to connect to
> >>the
> >> server:
> >>
> >> http://192.168.99.100:8984/
> >>
> >> you can get the ip address using the "docker-machine ip" command:
> >> c:\Program Files\Docker Toolbox>docker-machine ls
> >> NAME      ACTIVE   URL          STATE     URL
> >> SWARM   DOCKER   ERRORS
> >> default   -        virtualbox   Running   tcp://192.168.99.100:2376
> >>    v1.9.1
> >> c:\Program Files\Docker Toolbox>docker-machine ip default
> >> 192.168.99.100
> >>
> >> the docker-machine command replaces the older boot2docker command
> >>
> >> So now I have BaseX server running and accessible as Docker containers
> >> under Windows and CentOS.
> >>
> >> OSX is still a problem: there's some issue with the docker daemon and
> >> getting the docker client to connect to it. Haven't been able to find a
> >> good solution in my searching. Very annoying.
> >>
> >> Cheers,
> >>
> >> E.
> >>
> >>
> >> ----
> >> Eliot Kimber, Owner
> >> Contrext, LLC
> >> http://contrext.com
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 1/26/16, 3:50 PM, "Eliot Kimber"
> >> <basex-talk-bounces@mailman.uni-konstanz.de on behalf of
> >> ekimber@contrext.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>>For what it's worth, I've pushed a generic BaseX HTTP container to
> >>>Docker
> >>>Hub as "dfst/basex". It exposes the default ports for the base and HTTP
> >>>servers (1984 and 8984).
> >>>
> >> >From a Linux system you connect by using the IP address of the Docker
> >>>network, e.g.:
> >>>
> >>>http://172.17.0.2:8984/
> >>>
> >>>Under Windows:
> >>>
> >>>The DockerFile is in GitHub here:
> >>>
> >>>https://github.com/dita-for-small-teams/dfst-docker
> >>>
> >>>My next task will be to create a container based on this one that
> >>>includes
> >>>specific configuration and the DFST Web application modules. Should be
> >>>easy once I get to it.
> >>>
> >>>Cheers,
> >>>
> >>>E.
> >>>
> >>>----
> >>>Eliot Kimber, Owner
> >>>Contrext, LLC
> >>>http://contrext.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>On 1/26/16, 9:48 AM, "Eliot Kimber"
> >>><basex-talk-bounces@mailman.uni-konstanz.de on behalf of
> >>>ekimber@contrext.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>OK, I'm going to proceed with making a generic basex Docker container
> >>>>in
> >>>>the DFST Docker project on GitHub. I'm using Andreas' as a starting
> >>>>point
> >>>>but it's pretty trivial.
> >>>>
> >>>>I'm working/testing on OS X, Windows, and CentOS so I should be able to
> >>>>get something going.
> >>>>
> >>>>Cheers,
> >>>>
> >>>>E.
> >>>>----
> >>>>Eliot Kimber, Owner
> >>>>Contrext, LLC
> >>>>http://contrext.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>On 1/26/16, 2:02 AM, "Christian Grün" <christian.gruen@gmail.com>
> >>>>wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Hi Eliot,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Personally, I had a hard time making Docker work on Windows machines,
> >>>>>but we have various Docker aficionados in our team and around, so I
> >>>>>hope they¹ll give you some feedback soon.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>Cheers,
> >>>>>Christian
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>On Sun, Jan 24, 2016 at 8:22 PM, Eliot Kimber <ekimber@contrext.com>
> >>>>>wrote:
> >>>>>> I'm working toward using BaseX in a Docker container as part of the
> >>>>>>DITA
> >>>>>> for Small Teams project (we're trying to set up a system of Docker
> >>>>>> containers with all the DFST parts integrated out of the box).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I notice that Andreas Jung has create a simple container here:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> https://github.com/zopyx/docker-basex
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> And pushed it to the Docker Hub in the basex namespace.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I'm wondering what the relationship of this is, if any, to any
> >>>>>>official
> >>>>>> BaseX Docker support?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Eliot
> >>>>>> ----
> >>>>>> Eliot Kimber, Owner
> >>>>>> Contrext, LLC
> >>>>>> http://contrext.com
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>