I hope that the tuple stream of a FLWOR expression does not accumulate heap memory. Is that the case, Christian, or anyone? Kendall From: "E. Wray Johnson" <wray.johnson@gmail.com> Date: Monday, November 20, 2017 at 10:37 AM To: Kendall Shaw <kendall.shaw@workday.com> Cc: BaseX <basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de> Subject: Re: [basex-talk] Loading data I may need to load hundreds of thousands of items each with dozens of sub-nodes. I am looking for a solution that will not be at risk of running out of heap memory. On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Kendall Shaw <kendall.shaw@workday.com<mailto:kendall.shaw@workday.com>> wrote: Hi, Just about building maps, in general: If you look at map:merge in http://docs.basex.org/wiki/Map_Module<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__docs.basex.org_wiki_Map-5FModule&d=DwMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=JgwnBEpN1c-DDmq-Up2QMq9rrGyfWK0KtSpT7dxRglA&m=Vqrcy5xoTXekYA_60uYsRLfwE8plvHtMAGq8kejU0do&s=NQHz3DOpC6VgtvcpVqQQScfIlaR_5kZ_TbihOEVZATY&e=> it shows a way to build a map with a for expression. If the question updating maps in a loop was about this, then it is probably preferable to have the result of the for expression be a map, rather than updating a map, iteratively. Kendall From: <basex-talk-bounces@mailman.uni-konstanz.de<mailto:basex-talk-bounces@mailman.uni-konstanz.de>> on behalf of "E. Wray Johnson" <wray.johnson@gmail.com<mailto:wray.johnson@gmail.com>> Date: Sunday, November 19, 2017 at 5:15 AM To: Michael Seiferle <ms@basex.org<mailto:ms@basex.org>> Cc: BaseX <basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de<mailto:basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de>> Subject: Re: [basex-talk] Loading data Thanks. I tried doing #2 inside the iteration and that did not work. I will try it your way and let you know if it works. Wray Johnson (m) 704-293-9008<tel:(704)%20293-9008> On Nov 19, 2017, at 6:30 AM, Michael Seiferle <ms@basex.org<mailto:ms@basex.org>> wrote: Dear Wray, I tried to come up with a sketch of what–I think–might help you: https://gist.github.com/micheee/8a8734a1713a7121cab15eb3dfb389d9<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gist.github.com_micheee_8a8734a1713a7121cab15eb3dfb389d9&d=DwMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=JgwnBEpN1c-DDmq-Up2QMq9rrGyfWK0KtSpT7dxRglA&m=0dY_XpYSlIufV9bPNvpZD4BvkOL2-P3MduC5WpG4FTc&s=Guzfb_5gXuH4sJ2goSUdevQcE_tYJ-A_zXytOn3yTPs&e=> Basically it boils down to: 1. Fetch the JSON 2. Convert that JSON to an XQuery item 3. Iterate over each array entry and explicitly construct the XML representation you want So in a nutshell, in XQuery 3.1, something like the following: fetch:text('https://gist.githubusercontent.com/Miserlou/c5cd8364bf9b2420bb29/raw/2bf258763cdddd704f8ffd3ea9a3e81d25e2c6f6/cities.json<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gist.githubusercontent.com_Miserlou_c5cd8364bf9b2420bb29_raw_2bf258763cdddd704f8ffd3ea9a3e81d25e2c6f6_cities.json&d=DwMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=JgwnBEpN1c-DDmq-Up2QMq9rrGyfWK0KtSpT7dxRglA&m=0dY_XpYSlIufV9bPNvpZD4BvkOL2-P3MduC5WpG4FTc&s=oX2YSOYRvXFIiOp87Q6C_ev1UGt0DWVkaCFu0whK6GM&e=>') => parse-json() (: Convert to XQuery item representation :) => array:for-each(function($map){ (: For each entry in that array, do :) element item { (: Construct an XML element named item :) $map => map:keys() => for-each(function($key){ (: For each key in the map, do: :) element { $key } { (: Return an element named $key :) $map($key) (: …and the value of $map($key) :) } }) } }) => array:flatten() (: Converts the array to a sequence :) I assume you are using BaseX, so maybe the json:parse() function might be another option, that is based on our own implementation and will create an XML representation right away: fetch:text('https://gist.githubusercontent.com/Miserlou/c5cd8364bf9b2420bb29/raw/2bf258763cdddd704f8ffd3ea9a3e81d25e2c6f6/cities.json<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gist.githubusercontent.com_Miserlou_c5cd8364bf9b2420bb29_raw_2bf258763cdddd704f8ffd3ea9a3e81d25e2c6f6_cities.json&d=DwMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=JgwnBEpN1c-DDmq-Up2QMq9rrGyfWK0KtSpT7dxRglA&m=0dY_XpYSlIufV9bPNvpZD4BvkOL2-P3MduC5WpG4FTc&s=oX2YSOYRvXFIiOp87Q6C_ev1UGt0DWVkaCFu0whK6GM&e=>') => json:parse() For more info on our BaseX JSON-Module see: http://docs.basex.org/wiki/JSON_Module<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=http-3A__docs.basex.org_wiki_JSON-5FModule&d=DwMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=JgwnBEpN1c-DDmq-Up2QMq9rrGyfWK0KtSpT7dxRglA&m=0dY_XpYSlIufV9bPNvpZD4BvkOL2-P3MduC5WpG4FTc&s=Uia9oCJta1vQG3jvblV437dpVM5JvI9GsfmVjj2xssY&e=> As I can only guess what your XQuery code actually looks like I hope this comes somewhat close to what you want. Hope this helps ;-) Best from Konstanz Michael Am 19.11.2017 um 06:25 schrieb E. Wray Johnson <wray.johnson@gmail.com<mailto:wray.johnson@gmail.com>>: I have a JSON file https://gist.githubusercontent.com/Miserlou/c5cd8364bf9b2420bb29/raw/2bf258763cdddd704f8ffd3ea9a3e81d25e2c6f6/cities.json<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__gist.githubusercontent.com_Miserlou_c5cd8364bf9b2420bb29_raw_2bf258763cdddd704f8ffd3ea9a3e81d25e2c6f6_cities.json&d=DwMFaQ&c=DS6PUFBBr_KiLo7Sjt3ljp5jaW5k2i9ijVXllEdOozc&r=JgwnBEpN1c-DDmq-Up2QMq9rrGyfWK0KtSpT7dxRglA&m=0dY_XpYSlIufV9bPNvpZD4BvkOL2-P3MduC5WpG4FTc&s=oX2YSOYRvXFIiOp87Q6C_ev1UGt0DWVkaCFu0whK6GM&e=> I want to load it into a database in a different XML format where I can use gml:Point in place of longitude and latitude as separate elements. However my for loop does not emit individual XML elements for each json object in the loaded array.