On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Christian Grün christian.gruen@gmail.comwrote:
In particular, I'm wondering if multiple concurrent updates are unsafe
(that
is, lead to internal inconsistencies in BaseX that prevent further use of the database)
dito.
What does 'this' in your sentence refer to? Safety? Serializability? Transactions?
it simply means we have no free resources to put more effort on XQJ update issues. sorry.
I'm slow and I'm sorry I don't distinguish between XQJ, XQJ updates, and BaseX.
Is it possible to use BaseX as a library and have multiple JVMs access and update the same database in a way that is safe?
If so, how?
As I've stated before, I would prefer a non-BaseX-specific way of interacting with it, such as XQJ, but if that's not possible because XQJ is in essence a standard never adopted and soon to be abandoned, then I'm also fine with any robust method that allows me to link my in-memory, org.w3c.dom* implementation-based model to the database. (I had sent out an email about this previously, with no resonance.)
- Godmar