I’ve created this GitHub project: https://github.com/ekimbernow/basex-orchestration

With just the orchestration code and one module with functions that are orchestrated, along with the original unit test.

This should work in isolation—it did in my tests 😊

The orchestration processing definitely works but I have no idea if this approach to managing multiple transactions is sound—I’m sure there are details in the code that can be improved but I put this together very quickly…

Cheers,

E.

_____________________________________________

Eliot Kimber

Sr Staff Content Engineer

O: 512 554 9368

M: 512 554 9368

servicenow.com

LinkedIn | Twitter | YouTube | Facebook

From: Eliot Kimber <eliot.kimber@servicenow.com>
Date: Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 11:50 AM
To: Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>
Cc: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de <basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de>
Subject: Re: [basex-talk] Using %unit:after to verify database creation

No worries—I’ll try to make something smaller at some point. I’m sorry my initial attempt didn’t work. Did not mean to waste your time with that. The orchestration bit is possibly useful as a standalone thing so might be worth taking the effort to package it as its own little github project.

Cheers,

E.

_____________________________________________

Eliot Kimber

Sr Staff Content Engineer

O: 512 554 9368

M: 512 554 9368

servicenow.com

LinkedIn | Twitter | YouTube | Facebook

From: Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>
Date: Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 11:39 AM
To: Eliot Kimber <eliot.kimber@servicenow.com>
Cc: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de <basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de>
Subject: Re: [basex-talk] Using %unit:after to verify database creation

[External Email]


I still get numerous parsing errors when opening your project files
with BaseX, and I’m sorry I don’t have time to track all this down. If
you believe that anything of your code that can still be dropped, feel
free to give it a go. See e.g. [1] for some hints on some suggestions.

[1] https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://stackoverflow.com/help/minimal-reproducible-example__;!!N4vogdjhuJM!Uw8n7H4gU-0LZJBR5OFYbnRkp3bE1Bc_y-dcqHfm884d73RvzLmBm5UFSPt1F1VT6rEwuA$


On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 6:30 PM Eliot Kimber
<eliot.kimber@servicenow.com> wrote:
>
> Let me remake the sample code—it should all be there—with my now-working job construction log.
>
>
>
> The issue with the unit tests not seeing the results of the jobs remains.
>
>
>
> I’ve attached take 2 of the code, which fixes my earlier bug with job creation and running, so that, for example, the test:runMultipleJobs test does create all three expected databases, meaning the chain of three jobs ran.
>
>
>
> I tested this code package by deleting the now/ directory from basex/repo, verifying nothing works, copied the now/ directory from the zip to basex/repo, ran the test from the zip in the GUI:
>
>
>
> test /Users/eliot.kimber/temp/basex-job-test-test/test/test-orchestration.xqm
>
>
>
> which produces for me this result:
>
> <testsuites time="PT0.429S">
>
>   <testsuite name="file:///Users/eliot.kimber/temp/basex-job-test-test/test/test-orchestration.xqm" time="PT0.429S" tests="8" failures="4" errors="0" skipped="0">
>
>     <testcase name="createJob" time="PT0.036S"/>
>
>     <testcase name="createBadJob" time="PT0.016S"/>
>
>     <testcase name="runJobs1" time="PT0.065S">
>
>       <failure line="97" column="16">
>
>         <info>Expected database test_01 to exist</info>
>
>       </failure>
>
>     </testcase>
>
>     <testcase name="runJobs2" time="PT0.061S">
>
>       <failure line="123" column="14">
>
>         <info>Expected database test_01 to not exist</info>
>
>       </failure>
>
>     </testcase>
>
>     <testcase name="runMultipleJobs" time="PT0.041S">
>
>       <failure line="143" column="16">
>
>         <info>Expected database db1 to exist</info>
>
>       </failure>
>
>     </testcase>
>
>     <testcase name="runSwapJobs" time="PT0.074S">
>
>       <failure line="185" column="16">
>
>         <info>Expected to find doc2 in database test_swapped_to</info>
>
>       </failure>
>
>     </testcase>
>
>     <testcase name="makeJobsFromModules" time="PT0.016S"/>
>
>     <testcase name="makeSwapJobs" time="PT0.016S"/>
>
>   </testsuite>
>
> </testsuites>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
>
>
>
> E.
>
> _____________________________________________
>
> Eliot Kimber
>
> Sr Staff Content Engineer
>
> O: 512 554 9368
>
> M: 512 554 9368
>
> servicenow.com
>
> LinkedIn | Twitter | YouTube | Facebook
>
>
>
> From: Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com>
> Date: Saturday, February 19, 2022 at 11:02 AM
> To: Eliot Kimber <eliot.kimber@servicenow.com>
> Cc: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de <basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de>
> Subject: Re: [basex-talk] Using %unit:after to verify database creation
>
> [External Email]
>
>
> I guess the function dutils:getDirectReferences is still missing in
> your example.
>
> But I’m glad to hear you’ve already found the bug.