Hi Ying,
The reason is that your query requires a sequential scan of the full
> I am just very curious why for read-only queries, they will compete for disk
> I/O.
XML structure. If you run several requests in parallel, all requests
will try to read the same blocks in a slightly delayed order. As a
result, the pointer, which is reading a block on disk, will be moved
again and again, and the resulting pattern is somewhat random.
Due to the nature of your query, there is now way to benefit from
> It there anyway we can brutely load the whole index and then do the queries.
index structures. Instead, I would suggest to create additional
databases that contain all the information you will be frequently
accessing.
Christian