Hi,

The number (1, 2, 3,....) are the various searches done..

The huge amount (its not $$$$ ;) ) is the memory usage in K as indicated by Windows Task Manager.

Query's, rather XQuery's are of various kinds, including XQuery functions like disitnct-values, casting functions, and many more..
some using joins, some using ft:search()...


Well, I think, the reason would be in JAVA code itself, not related to BaseX..



On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 4:30 PM, <basex-talk-request@mailman.uni-konstanz.de> wrote:
Send BaseX-Talk mailing list submissions to
        basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        basex-talk-request@mailman.uni-konstanz.de

You can reach the person managing the list at
        basex-talk-owner@mailman.uni-konstanz.de

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of BaseX-Talk digest..."


Today's Topics:

   1. Memory usage !! (John Best)
   2. Re: Memory usage !! (jean-marc Mercier)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 16:04:40 +0530
From: John Best <johnbest5673@gmail.com>
To: basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
Subject: [basex-talk] Memory usage !!
Message-ID:
        <CAO14Co4C85Y+VA6fURygkb-jUbeqX4qJ0Hm=biduq8vMFDnzKg@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Dear Team,

I have developed and application using Eclipse RCP. I am using BaseX 7.6 to
store XML data.

Yesterday, when I was testing the application with various kind of
searches, the response was quite slow as I went ahead with more and more
searches.

To my surprise, I notices the in Windows Task Manager, the javaw.exe was
consuming more memory... Then I restarted the laptop and did this procedure
again

Following is the memory usage -

1 -      84920
2  -   101584
3  -   108224
4  -   109284
5  -   111768
6  -   128468
7  -   160616
8  -   180212
9  -   198313
10  -  212592


Why this is so ? and how can I reduce this memory usage by javaw.exe ?



--
Have a nice day
JBest
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/pipermail/basex-talk/attachments/20131230/d4d7399a/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

Message: 2
Date: Mon, 30 Dec 2013 11:45:04 +0100
From: jean-marc Mercier <jeanmarc.mercier@gmail.com>
To: John Best <johnbest5673@gmail.com>
Cc: BaseX <basex-talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de>
Subject: Re: [basex-talk] Memory usage !!
Message-ID:
        <CA+uM3rh0iZ5iSELwfdZ8+fLmmJKtbVtWYAYhsEi9N+Dvfid9tw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"

Hi John,
I am a simple BaseX user, not belonging to BaseX team, but my first penny
guess is that you are providing too few information to your request to be
proceeded:
what are these numbers expressed in, how did you produced them, what kind
of query are you trying to run, etc etc...
Hope this helps,

Cheers,
Jean-Marc


2013/12/30 John Best <johnbest5673@gmail.com>

> Dear Team,
>
> I have developed and application using Eclipse RCP. I am using BaseX 7.6
> to store XML data.
>
> Yesterday, when I was testing the application with various kind of
> searches, the response was quite slow as I went ahead with more and more
> searches.
>
> To my surprise, I notices the in Windows Task Manager, the javaw.exe was
> consuming more memory... Then I restarted the laptop and did this procedure
> again
>
> Following is the memory usage -
>
> 1 -      84920
> 2  -   101584
> 3  -   108224
> 4  -   109284
> 5  -   111768
> 6  -   128468
> 7  -   160616
> 8  -   180212
> 9  -   198313
> 10  -  212592
>
>
> Why this is so ? and how can I reduce this memory usage by javaw.exe ?
>
>
>
> --
> Have a nice day
> JBest
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> BaseX-Talk mailing list
> BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
> https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/pipermail/basex-talk/attachments/20131230/1335a445/attachment-0001.html>

------------------------------

_______________________________________________
BaseX-Talk mailing list
BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de
https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk


End of BaseX-Talk Digest, Vol 48, Issue 60
******************************************



--
Regards


Have a nice day :)
Anand Chiney