…here is the official announcement:
http://www.w3.org/News/2013#entry-9676 ___________________________
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:38 PM, Christian Grün christian.gruen@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Andy,
true.. For everyone else: the latest versions of the XQuery 3.0 specs have just been made public:
http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-30/ http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-update-30/ http://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-full-text-30/
From my reading: it looks like the latest version of the spec has addressed the "updating operations in closures" issue. Can we expect a BaseX implementation soon :-)
Could you give me a hint which section do you exactly refer to? Christian ___________________________
On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:19 PM, Andy Bunce bunce.andy@gmail.com wrote:
/Andy
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 2:40 PM, Christian Grün christian.gruen@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Doesn't it introduce performance problems though? If you do this copying with some bigger chunk of XML does it take the same amount of memory or is it somehow "delta" optimized?
Yes; this is due to the specification, btw. Whatever you copy in your XQUF spec. is supposed to be cached before it is being evaluated.
Regarding updating operations in closures: the current version of the spec. disallows updating operations, because it cannot be statically determined if a dynamic function invocation is an updating expression or not. See [1] for more details.
Best, Christian
[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-update-30/#id-dynamic-function-invocation _______________________________________________ BaseX-Talk mailing list BaseX-Talk@mailman.uni-konstanz.de https://mailman.uni-konstanz.de/mailman/listinfo/basex-talk