Hi Christian, Ok, that clears it up. Somehow I suspected this, but I was thrown by the statement in the spec (and my faulty intuition) that says: If the KeySpecifier is a wildcard ("*") and the context item is a map, unary lookup is equivalent to the following expression: for $k in map:keys(.) return .($k) I realize that if I didn't put an array {} around the return value then this statement would be correct. Just thought I caught a loophole there. I stand corrected. ;-) On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Christian Grün <christian.gruen@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi Marc,

The result is correct: The FOR clause of the FLWOR expression always binds one item at a time. If you want to bind sequences, you should use arrays in your map constructor:

let $map := map { 'a': [1,2,3], 'b': [4,5,6] } return $map?*

Hope this helps, Christian

On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 3:47 PM, Marc van Grootel <marc.van.grootel@gmail.com> wrote:

...

Hi,

Unless I'm not reading the spec[1] correctly then the following two snippets should have the same result:

Example 1:

let $map := map { 'a': (1,2,3), 'b': (4,5,6)} for $k in map:keys($map) return array { $map($k) }

Example 2:

let $map := map { 'a': (1,2,3), 'b': (4,5,6)} for $k in $map?* return array { $k }

However, this is not the case. The first outputs, as I expected:

([1,2,3], [4,5,6])

The second, counter intuitively returns (on 8.2.3) this:

([1],[2],[3],[4],[5],[6])

The spec indicates that both examples result should be identical. Didn't check if the same is going on with arrays.

Hmmm?

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xquery-31/#id-lookup

-- --Marc