Happy news everybody, our first file is 100% complete - the United
States. We have a majority coding decision for each specific plege (of
which there are admittedly few). Keep up the good work!
Best,
Leo
----------------
Dr. Leo Ahrens
leo.ahrens(a)uni-konstanz.de
Website <https://leoahrens.eu/>
Hi Julius,
yes, because this is not a falsifiable pledge as credit claiming relates
to a past achievement. THis is one of the miscodings that quality
assurance is supposed to catch.
Best,
Leo
----------------
Dr. Leo Ahrens
leo.ahrens(a)uni-konstanz.de
Website <https://leoahrens.eu/>
Am 25.04.2025 um 12:13 schrieb jkoelzer(a)politik.uni-kiel.de:
> Hey Guys,
>
> quick question from my side (maybe this was discussed before and I
> forgot it). Should you code NA promise_fullfilled when a statement is
> Credit Claiming? During quality assurance, I noticed that this is
> handled differently
>
> Best
> Julius
Hey Guys,
quick question from my side (maybe this was discussed before and I
forgot it). Should you code NA promise_fullfilled when a statement is
Credit Claiming? During quality assurance, I noticed that this is
handled differently
Best
Julius
Hi everyone,
I am writing regarding the quality assurance task. I just looked over
the files you are working on and can only find very little changes
marked in red. This is not necessarily bad, so do not take this as a
critique. I am just wondering now whether it is worth it to have so many
of you working on this.
Can everyone assigned to the task please report to me and share their
experiences so far, please? Do you change much or little? What kind of
changes do you make? Are you making progress and how long do you
estimate to be working on your files? Do you think your time is well spent?
Thanks everyone!
Best,
Leo
----------------
Dr. Leo Ahrens
leo.ahrens(a)uni-konstanz.de
Website <https://leoahrens.eu/>
Hi everyone,
there seems to be some confusion on when to code a pledge as fulfilled.
I would like to stress again that you code legislative decisions, ie
when pledges are put into law, and not the implementation of laws.
Imagine that a party promised a tax rate decrease on low earners. The
parliament passes the law, but the tax rate decreases will only take
effect after a two-year grace period. The pledge is fulfilled here - do
not worry about the implementation date. Be careful in your research
because it may be easy to mix up the legislative act and implementation
date, e.g. because of delayed media reporting.
Thank you!
Best wishes,
Leo
----------------
Dr. Leo Ahrens
leo.ahrens(a)uni-konstanz.de
Website <https://leoahrens.eu/>
Hi everyone,
many of you are now working on quality assurance, i.e. another round of
looking over almost-finished files to make sure that nothing is missing
and the language is presentable. The guidelines for this task are
attached below for future reference. This includes tasks that not
everyone has been made aware of yet: please check whether all provided
links are working; and please mark all your changes in red font so that
we can see what you have changed afterwards. Here is the full list:
*Quality assurance*
* check whether the coders filled in everything they are supposed to
fill in. Are (1) sources provided, (2) all relevant statements
actually coded (e.g., coder 3 provided a source but forgot to fill
in pledge_fulfilled). Mark statements where something is missing in
an extra column - this will go back to the coders.
* read the statements again and, where applicable, check whether a
statement is flagged as credit claiming or status quo claim in the
notes. (credit claiming: this is not a pledge but rather boasting
about something great the party has done in the past; status quo
claim: "we will keep the top marginal income tax rate at the current
level")
* read the notes from all coders and edit the language where required
(spelling mistakes, non-professional language). This is not so much
about the contents but rather about how the notes look to an outsider.
* check whether all provided links are working
* mark all your changes in red font; we will look at them later.
Thank you!
Best wishes,
Leo
----------------
Dr. Leo Ahrens
leo.ahrens(a)uni-konstanz.de
Website <https://leoahrens.eu/>
Hello to all coders,
there is ambiguity about whether and when to code pledges as fulfilled
after the government term has ended. We discussed in our last team
meeting that we would give governments some leeway. But it appears that
neither Alex nor I nor everybody on the team is on the same page what
this entails.
I keep hearing that pledge fulfillment after a government term pops up
again and again in the data. As far as I am concerned, this should only
be coded as fulfilled when the pledge is fulfilled after a new
legislature has formed but before the next government takes over, as
government formation can take some time. This is what we currently see
in Germany: there has been a new parliament for quite some time now, but
the old government is still working until the CDU+SPD agree on their
terms and elect Merz as the new Bundeskanzler (which will allow him to
form a new government and cabinet).
Is this what is happening in the data? It would be very helpful if
everyone could provide me with two concrete examples from your coding
data so we can get a feeling for why this keeps popping up in the data.
This will allow us to set a concrete rule for your coding decisions.
Please get to this as soon as possible - on your first working day after
the small easter holiday at the latest. We need this information to
guide your further coding, and this is a priority atm.
Thank you very much!
Best wishes,
Leo
----------------
Dr. Leo Ahrens
leo.ahrens(a)uni-konstanz.de
Website <https://leoahrens.eu/>